FAR-REACHING DEVELOPMENTS SURROUNDING EMOLUMENT ATTACHMENT ORDERS

by | Jul 13, 2015 | 0 comments

On the 8th of July 2015 the Cape High Court came to far-reaching findings in a class action brought by the University of Stellenbosch’s Legal Aid Clinic on behalf of several employees. In this judgement some of the provisions of the Magistrate’s Court Act were found to be unconstitutional.

An effective way for micro-lenders to recover money owed to them has been to arrange for it to be deducted from employees’ salaries. They would approach a debtor to sign a consent for an emolument attachment order (EAO), also known as a ‘garnishee order’, to be issued by the Magistrates’ Court. An employer served with an EAO would have no choice other than to give effect to such order, sometimes resulting in an employee having hardly any money to take home after deductions.

Flaws
Several flaws in the system were highlighted in the course of this hearing. These included that:
– There was no statutory limit on the total amount to be deducted from an employee’s wages (as was the case in several other countries).
– On the facts presented, the ‘consent’ forms were not signed on a voluntarily or informed basis;
– EAO’s could be issued by the Clerk of the Court, without prior judicial oversight as to whether the issuing of EAO’s were just and equitable;
– EAO’s were often obtained in remote courts, outside the jurisdiction of the Court in which they resided or worked;

Consequences
Although the application was brought in respect of a group of 15 people, it is significant that, among many criticisms regarding the abuse of the system, the Court also found that certain of the provisions of the Magistrates’ Court Act pertaining to EAO’s were unconstitutional. This means that the effect of the judgement is not limited to the applicants in this case. So the question is: Are EAO’s still enforceable and what should employers do? There is likely to be much controversy surrounding the practical consequences of this judgement. Our advice is that, at least for now, employers should seek legal advice before disregarding emolument attachment orders.

For a copy of the judgement, click here:
Emolument attachment orders_2015_Univ Stellenbosch Legal Aid_HC

 

For more details go to www.labourwise.co.za or contact us at info@labourwise.co.za

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent News & Articles

WORK VISA EXTENSION FOR FOREIGNERS

Home Affairs extends Zimbabwean Exemption Permits (ZEP’s), Lesotho Exemption Permits (LEP’s) & concessions for waiver and appeal applications by foreigners.

NEW EARNINGS THRESHOLD AS FROM 1 MAY 2026

New BCEA earnings threshold from 1 May 2026. Employers must review which employees now qualify for overtime, working time protections and other statutory rights.

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE – 1 MARCH 2026

The national minimum wage increases from 1 March 2026, with sector-specific minimum rates, defined exclusions and an exemption process for qualifying employers.